Current:Home > Contact2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self -TrueNorth Capital Hub
2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
View
Date:2025-04-15 04:45:18
Scientists and global leaders revealed on Tuesday that the "Doomsday Clock" has been reset to the closest humanity has ever come to self-annihilation.
For the first time in three years, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists moved the metaphorical clock up one second to 89 seconds before midnight, the theoretical doomsday mark.
"It is the determination of the science and security board of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists that the world has not made sufficient progress on existential risks threatening all of humanity. We thus move the clock forward," Daniel Holz, chair of the organization's science and security board, said during a livestreamed unveiling of the clock's ominous new time.
"In setting the clock closer to midnight, we send a stark signal," Holz said. "Because the world is already perilously closer to the precipice, any move towards midnight should be taken as an indication of extreme danger and an unmistakable warning. Every second of delay in reversing course increases the probability of global disaster."
For the last two years, the clock has stayed at 90 seconds to midnight, with scientists citing the ongoing war in Ukraine and an increase in the risk of nuclear escalation as the reason.
Among the reasons for moving the clock one second closer to midnight, Holz said, were the further increase in nuclear risk, climate change, biological threats, and advances in disruptive technologies like artificial intelligence.
"Meanwhile, arms control treaties are in tatters and there are active conflicts involving nuclear powers. The world’s attempt to deal with climate change remain inadequate as most governments fail to enact financing and policy initiatives necessary to halt global warming," Holz said, noting that 2024 was the hottest year ever recorded on the planet.
"Advances in an array of disruptive technology, including biotechnology, artificial intelligence and in space have far outpaced policy, regulation and a thorough understanding of their consequences," Holz said.
Holtz said all of the dangers that went into the organization's decision to recalibrate the clock were exacerbated by what he described as a "potent threat multiplier": The spread of misinformation, disinformation and conspiracy theories "that degrade the communication ecosystem and increasingly blur the line between truth and falsehood."
What is the Doomsday Clock?
The Doomsday Clock was designed to be a graphic warning to the public about how close humanity has come to destroying the world with potentially dangerous technologies.
The clock was established in 1947 by Albert Einstein, Manhattan Project director J. Robert Oppenheimer, and University of Chicago scientists who helped develop the first atomic weapons as part of the Manhattan Project. Created less than two years after the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, during World War II, the clock was initially set at seven minutes before midnight.
Over the past seven decades, the clock has been adjusted forward and backward multiple times. The farthest the minute hand has been pushed back from the cataclysmic midnight hour was 17 minutes in 1991, after the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty was revived and then-President George H.W. Bush and Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev announced reductions in the nuclear arsenals of their respective countries.
For the past 77 years, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, a nonprofit media organization comprised of world leaders and Nobel laureates, has announced how close it believes the world is to collapse due to nuclear war, climate change and, most recently, the COVID-19 pandemic.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Is Your Skin Feeling Sandy? Smooth Things Over With These 12 Skincare Products
- Millions Now at Risk From Oil and Gas-Related Earthquakes, Scientists Say
- 2017: Pipeline Resistance Gathers Steam From Dakota Access, Keystone Success
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- Coronavirus ‘Really Not the Way You Want To Decrease Emissions’
- San Diego, Calif’s No. 1 ‘Solar City,’ Pushes Into Wind Power
- Despite Pledges, Birmingham Lags on Efficiency, Renewables, Sustainability
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Some electric vehicle owners say no need for range anxiety
Ranking
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Texas Gov. Abbott signs bill banning transgender athletes from participating on college sports teams aligned with their gender identities
- Idaho dropped thousands from Medicaid early in the pandemic. Which state's next?
- San Diego, Calif’s No. 1 ‘Solar City,’ Pushes Into Wind Power
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- How seniors could lose in the Medicare political wars
- Vanderpump Rules Finale: Tom Sandoval and Raquel Leviss Declare Their Love Amid Cheating Scandal
- Salma Hayek Suffers NSFW Wardrobe Malfunction on Instagram Live
Recommendation
How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
Vanderpump Rules Finale Bombshells: The Fallout of Scandoval & Even More Cheating Confessions
Selling Sunset Cast Reacts to Chrishell Stause and G Flip's Marriage
'All the Beauty and the Bloodshed' chronicles Nan Goldin's career of art and activism
Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
Emotional Vin Diesel Details How Meadow Walker’s Fast X Cameo Honors Her Late Dad Paul Walker
U.S. Military Knew Flood Risks at Offutt Air Force Base, But Didn’t Act in Time
How seniors could lose in the Medicare political wars