Current:Home > ScamsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -TrueNorth Capital Hub
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-13 23:17:07
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (42)
Related
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Toyota RAV4 Hybrid vs. RAV4 Prime: How to find the right compact SUV for you
- Zhilei Zhang knocks out Deontay Wilder: Round-by-round fight analysis
- Teen Mom's Maci Bookout and Leah Messer Share How They Talk to Their Teens About Sex
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Adele calls out 'stupid' concertgoer for shouting 'Pride sucks' at her show: 'Shut up!'
- Wall Street's surprise prophet: Technology stocks are expected to rise parabolically, and Nvidia's rise has just begun!
- Yuka Saso rallies to win 2024 U.S. Women's Open for second major title
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Jeremy Renner's 'blessing': His miracle 'Mayor of Kingstown' return from near-death accident
Ranking
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Caitlin Clark's impact? Fever surpass 2023 home attendance mark after only five games
- 1 family hopes new law to protect children online prevents tragedies like theirs
- Maya Hawke on her new music, dropping out of Juilliard and collaborating with dad, Ethan
- Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
- Plan to attack soccer events during Paris Olympics foiled, French authorities say
- Taylor Swift performs 'The Prophecy' from 'Tortured Poets' for first time in France: Watch
- ‘Garfield,’ ‘Furiosa’ repeat atop box office charts as slow summer grinds on
Recommendation
North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
Brody Malone overcomes gruesome injury to win men's all-around US championship
With home prices up more than 50%, some states try to contain property taxes
Shooting in Ohio kills 1, wounds 2 dozen others, police say
Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, a Texas Democrat, says she has pancreatic cancer
Zhilei Zhang knocks out Deontay Wilder: Round-by-round fight analysis
GameStop leaps in premarket as Roaring Kitty may hold large position